board-presentations

Board Presentations & Stakeholder Communications Strategy Framework

A comprehensive prompt designed for C-suite executives and senior leaders to craft compelling board presentations and develop strategic stakeholder communication plans. This framework incorporates boardroom best practices, data visualization strategies, and multi-channel engagement approaches to drive board alignment, secure stakeholder buy-in, and foster transparent executive communication.

Your Prompt

  

How to Use

This prompt is designed for C-suite executives, board members, and communications professionals who need to deliver high-stakes board presentations or develop comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategies. Replace all bracketed placeholders with specific information about your presentation context, stakeholder groups, and organizational situation. The more detailed your inputs, the more customized and effective your presentation and communication strategy will be. Use this prompt when preparing for board meetings, major announcements, crisis communications, strategic initiatives requiring approval, or systematic stakeholder relationship building.

Pro Tips

  • Lead with your governing thesis, not your supporting data. Board members need to understand the big idea and decision context immediately, then evaluate supporting evidence through that lens. A governing thesis might be: 'We should invest in digital transformation now because our current technology advantage will erode within 18 months without modernization.'
  • Cut your slide count in half from what you initially draft. If you think you need 20 slides for a 20-minute presentation, cut to 10. Focus on conclusions and key insights rather than process details or comprehensive data. Appendices and detailed materials should be available but not presented unless specifically requested.
  • Prepare ruthlessly for board questions and pushback. Anticipate the 5-10 toughest questions board members might ask about your proposal, prepare concise answers with supporting data, and practice responding calmly under pressure. Hostile questions from intelligent experts are a feature of board dynamics, not a failure.
  • Use visual storytelling rather than dense text slides. Create infographics, comparison matrices, and charts that allow board members to grasp key information quickly. Each slide should support 1-2 key points maximum. Words on slides should be headlines and key terms, not complete thoughts or data tables.
  • Send strategic pre-reads 2-3 days before the presentation including: executive summary with the governing thesis, key data supporting your proposal, financial analysis, and risk assessment. This allows board members to come prepared with informed questions, significantly improving the quality of discussion during the presentation.
  • Practice the art of the strategic pause during board presentations. After making a key point or asking for board input, resist the urge to fill silence with additional talking. Pauses signal confidence, give board members time to formulate questions, and prevent defensive over-explanation that can undermine your credibility.

Board Presentation Fundamentals

Board presentations differ fundamentally from other executive presentations in tone, pace, and expectations. Board members are sophisticated decision-makers who value efficiency and clarity; they expect presenters to move quickly from context to recommendations and to articulate what decision or input they need from the board. Best practices include: starting with a governing thesis that frames the entire discussion, providing sufficient context without getting bogged down in operational details, using data visualization to make complex information accessible, clearly identifying risks and mitigation strategies, and ending with an explicit call-to-action requesting specific board input or approval. Pre-reads sent 2-3 days in advance allow board members to come prepared with questions, allowing you to spend presentation time on dialogue rather than background briefing. Structure presentations for 15-30 minutes to allow adequate time for substantive discussion.

Stakeholder Segmentation and Tailored Messaging

Different stakeholder groups have distinct information needs, communication preferences, and decision criteria. Effective stakeholder communication requires segmenting audiences and tailoring messaging accordingly. Board members focus on fiduciary risk, strategic alignment, and governance. Shareholders prioritize financial performance and value creation. Employees care about organizational culture, career impact, and role clarity. Customers/partners emphasize mutual benefits and value delivery. Develop 3-5 core messages for each segment using accessible language and group-specific concerns. Establish appropriate communication cadences (quarterly for boards, monthly for employees, ad-hoc for partners) and preferred channels (formal meetings for boards, email or town halls for employees). Implement a systematic feedback mechanism to gather stakeholder input and demonstrate through "You Said, We Did" communication how their feedback influenced outcomes.

Data Visualization and Business Case Development

Executive audiences expect data-driven presentations backed by rigorous business cases. Identify 5-7 critical KPIs that demonstrate the significance of the issue or value of your proposal. Present financial analysis including revenue impact, cost savings, ROI calculation, payback period, and impact on key financial metrics. Visualize data using simple, clean charts and graphs that highlight trends, comparisons, and forecasts rather than overwhelming detail. Include competitive or market justification using external research, competitor analysis, and industry trends. Develop a robust risk assessment identifying top 3-5 risks with clear mitigation strategies and contingency plans. Avoid information overload; focus on insights rather than raw data. Use appendices for detailed supporting materials that stakeholders can review independently without cluttering the main presentation.

EDGE Model and Strategic Stakeholder Engagement

The EDGE model (Expanded, Distinctive, Growth-oriented, Engaged) provides a framework for systematic stakeholder relationship building. Expanded refers to positioning leadership as the organization's bridge to the external stakeholder world, ensuring consistent external-facing communication. Distinctive involves developing a proprietary narrative and compelling organizational story that differentiates the company in stakeholder communication. Growth-oriented means empowering a team of internal and external ambassadors to articulate the organization's vision consistently beyond just the CEO. Engaged refers to systematically strengthening stakeholder connections through predictable communication cadences, transparent decision-making, and demonstrated responsiveness to stakeholder feedback. Apply this framework by identifying key stakeholder relationships to strengthen, developing consistent messaging that can be delivered by multiple ambassadors, establishing regular communication schedules, and building feedback mechanisms that show stakeholders their input matters.

Related Prompts

View prompt
strategic-planning

Executive Strategic Planning & Vision Development Framework

You are an expert strategic planning consultant with 20+ years of experience advising Fortune 500 executives and leadership teams. Your expertise spans multiple strategic frameworks including Balanced Scorecard, OKRs, SWOT analysis, Porter's Five Forces, and McKinsey 7S Model. Your task is to develop a comprehensive strategic plan and vision statement for [ORGANIZATION NAME AND INDUSTRY] that will guide the organization over the next [TIME PERIOD]. Context and Background: - Organization size and structure: [CURRENT ORGANIZATIONAL DETAILS] - Current market position: [MARKET POSITION AND COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE] - Key challenges faced: [PRIMARY CHALLENGES AND PAIN POINTS] - Available resources: [BUDGET, TEAM, TECHNOLOGY, AND OTHER RESOURCES] - Stakeholder priorities: [KEY STAKEHOLDER EXPECTATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS] Deliver a strategic plan that includes: 1. Vision Statement: A compelling, aspirational statement (2-3 sentences) that articulates where the organization aims to be in [TIME PERIOD]. This should inspire stakeholders and provide clear directional guidance. 2. Mission Alignment: Explain how this vision aligns with the organization's core mission, values, and purpose. 3. Strategic Analysis: Conduct a comprehensive situational analysis using: - SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) - Key market trends and external factors (PESTEL if applicable) - Competitive positioning assessment 4. Strategic Goals and Objectives: Define 3-5 SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) that directly support the vision. Each goal should include: - Clear success metrics and KPIs - Resource requirements - Potential risks and mitigation strategies 5. Action Plan and Priorities: For each strategic goal, outline: - Key initiatives and action steps - Responsible parties and governance structure - Quarterly milestones for the first year - Dependencies and critical path items 6. Stakeholder Engagement Strategy: Detail how you will communicate the vision and strategic plan to different stakeholder groups (board, employees, customers, partners) and secure buy-in. 7. Performance Monitoring Framework: Recommend a framework (such as Balanced Scorecard or OKR methodology) for tracking progress, including: - Review cadence (monthly, quarterly, annually) - Dashboard metrics and reporting structure - Adjustment mechanisms for course correction Format your response as an executive-ready strategic planning document with clear sections, actionable insights, and data-driven recommendations. Include relevant strategic frameworks and best practices from leading organizations. Ensure the plan is realistic yet ambitious, accounting for organizational constraints while pushing for transformational growth.

vision-development
View prompt
decision-making

Executive Decision-Making Frameworks & Strategic Choice Architecture

You are an expert executive advisor and decision scientist with 20+ years of experience helping C-suite leaders navigate complex, high-stakes decisions. Your expertise spans multiple decision-making frameworks including RAPID, SPADE, OODA Loop, Cynefin Framework, Eisenhower Matrix, Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model, Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis, Recognition Primed Decision (RPD) model, and Regret Minimization Framework. You understand organizational dynamics, cognitive biases, risk assessment, and the behavioral economics of executive decision-making. Your task is to guide [EXECUTIVE TITLE/NAME] through a structured decision-making process for [ORGANIZATION NAME AND INDUSTRY] regarding the following strategic decision: Decision Context: - Core decision or choice to be made: [SPECIFIC DECISION STATEMENT - e.g., "Should we acquire Company X?", "Should we pivot our business model?", "Should we enter a new market?"] - Strategic importance and urgency: [WHY THIS DECISION MATTERS NOW - market pressures, competitive threats, opportunities] - Decision complexity level: [SIMPLE/COMPLICATED/COMPLEX/CHAOTIC - describe what makes it complex] - Key stakeholders affected: [LIST INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS IMPACTED] - Available decision timeline: [TIME CONSTRAINT - immediate, weeks, months] - Risk tolerance and constraints: [ORGANIZATIONAL RISK APPETITE, BUDGET LIMITS, REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS] - Previous related decisions or context: [RELEVANT HISTORY, PRIOR INITIATIVES, LESSONS LEARNED] Deliver a comprehensive executive decision-making analysis that includes: 1. Decision Framework Selection and Rationale: - Analyze the decision context using the Cynefin Framework to determine whether the problem is Simple (best practice), Complicated (expert analysis), Complex (probe-sense-respond), or Chaotic (act-sense-respond) - Recommend the most appropriate primary decision framework(s) based on the decision's complexity, urgency, and stakeholder configuration - Explain why this framework is optimal for this specific decision context and what pitfalls it helps avoid 2. RAPID Decision Rights Matrix (for collaborative decisions): - Recommend: Who provides input and makes recommendations? - Agree: Who must formally agree before the decision proceeds (typically limited to 1-2 people with veto power)? - Perform: Who will execute the decision once made? - Input: Who should be consulted for their expertise or perspective? - Decide: Who is the single decision-maker with final authority? Provide specific names, roles, or organizational functions for each RAPID element to eliminate ambiguity and ensure accountability. 3. Structured Decision Analysis: - Problem Definition: Articulate the decision in clear, unambiguous terms. What exactly are we deciding? What are we NOT deciding? - Objectives and Success Criteria: Define 3-5 key objectives this decision must achieve and measurable success criteria - Alternatives Generation: Identify 3-5 viable alternatives or courses of action, including status quo and creative options - Evaluation Criteria: Establish weighted criteria for evaluating alternatives (strategic fit, financial return, risk level, implementation feasibility, stakeholder impact) - Alternatives Assessment: Systematically evaluate each alternative against the criteria using a decision matrix or scorecard approach 4. Risk Assessment and Scenario Analysis: - Best Case Scenario: Outcomes if everything goes optimally - Base Case Scenario: Most likely outcomes based on realistic assumptions - Worst Case Scenario: Downside risks and failure modes - For each scenario, quantify potential financial impact, timeline to results, probability assessment, and early warning indicators - Identify irreversible decisions vs. reversible decisions (two-way vs. one-way doors) - Outline risk mitigation strategies and contingency plans for major risks 5. Cognitive Bias Check and Challenge Questions: - Identify potential cognitive biases that may distort this decision: confirmation bias, anchoring bias, sunk cost fallacy, optimism bias, groupthink, availability heuristic - Generate 5-7 challenging questions designed to stress-test assumptions and surface hidden risks: * "What would have to be true for this decision to fail?" * "What information, if revealed, would completely change our thinking?" * "Are we solving the right problem or treating a symptom?" * "What would our successor CEO decide if starting fresh?" * Custom questions relevant to the specific decision context 6. OODA Loop for Dynamic Environments (if decision involves fast-changing conditions): - Observe: What data, trends, and signals should we continuously monitor? - Orient: How do we interpret this information given our organizational context, culture, and competitive position? - Decide: What decision rules or triggers will prompt action or course correction? - Act: What are the specific actions and rapid implementation steps? - How will we build feedback loops to enable rapid iteration and adaptation? 7. Regret Minimization Framework (for high-stakes, irreversible decisions): - Project forward 10 years: Looking back from the future, which decision would you most regret not making? - Short-term impact (10-10-10 analysis): How will you feel about this decision in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? - Opportunity cost analysis: What opportunities are we forgoing by choosing this path? - Reversibility assessment: Can this decision be undone or adapted if circumstances change? 8. Implementation Roadmap and Decision Quality Check: - Immediate next steps (first 30 days after decision) - Key milestones and decision gates for reviewing progress - Communication plan: How will the decision be communicated to stakeholders with rationale? - Monitoring framework: What KPIs will track whether the decision is producing intended results? - Decision review schedule: When will we formally review the decision's outcomes and adapt if needed? 9. Decision Quality Assessment: - Evaluate the decision process quality across six dimensions: * Frame: Is the decision framed correctly? Are we solving the right problem? * Alternatives: Have we generated creative, diverse options? * Information: Do we have sufficient, reliable information? * Values: Are our evaluation criteria aligned with organizational values and strategy? * Reasoning: Is our analysis logical, rigorous, and free from major biases? * Commitment: Do key stakeholders have buy-in and commitment to execute? - Identify any quality gaps that need to be addressed before finalizing the decision 10. Executive Recommendation and Call-to-Action: - Provide a clear, evidence-based recommendation on which alternative to pursue - Summarize the 3-5 most compelling reasons supporting this recommendation - Outline what the executive should do next: whose input is still needed, what additional information should be gathered, when the final decision should be made - Specify the "decision trigger" - what condition or milestone will prompt the final commitment Format your response as an executive decision brief with clear sections, visual decision matrices where appropriate, scenario comparisons, and actionable recommendations. Ensure the analysis is rigorous yet concise, balancing thoroughness with executive-level brevity. Ground all recommendations in the specific decision context while leveraging proven decision science principles and frameworks.

executive-frameworks
View prompt
change-management

Change Management & Organizational Transformation Leadership Framework

You are an expert organizational transformation consultant with 20+ years of experience leading large-scale change initiatives across Fortune 500 companies. Your expertise spans multiple change management frameworks including Kotter's 8-Step Process, ADKAR Model, Lewin's Change Management Model, McKinsey 7-S Model, Bridges' Transition Model, Prosci Methodology, Kübler-Ross Change Curve, Kaizen, Agile Change Management, and LaMarsh Managed Change. You understand change psychology, resistance management, culture transformation, stakeholder engagement, and the emotional dynamics of organizational transitions. Your task is to develop a comprehensive change management and organizational transformation strategy for [ORGANIZATION NAME AND INDUSTRY]. Transformation Context: - Type of change initiative: [SPECIFIC TRANSFORMATION - digital transformation, merger/acquisition integration, restructuring, culture change, business model pivot, technology implementation, process reengineering] - Scope and scale: [BREADTH - company-wide, division-level, functional area] and [DEPTH - incremental improvement vs. fundamental transformation] - Strategic rationale and drivers: [WHY THIS CHANGE IS NECESSARY - market forces, competitive threats, opportunities, performance gaps] - Current organizational state: [BASELINE - culture, capabilities, readiness, recent change history] - Desired future state: [TARGET VISION - what success looks like in 12-24 months] - Timeline and phases: [TRANSFORMATION TIMELINE AND KEY MILESTONES] - Resources available: [BUDGET, CHANGE TEAM, EXECUTIVE SPONSORSHIP, TECHNOLOGY, EXTERNAL SUPPORT] - Key stakeholder groups: [EMPLOYEES, LEADERSHIP, CUSTOMERS, PARTNERS, UNIONS, REGULATORS] - Anticipated resistance sources: [WHERE RESISTANCE IS EXPECTED AND WHY] Deliver a comprehensive change management and organizational transformation plan that includes: 1. Transformation Vision and Strategic Case for Change: - Compelling Change Story: Craft a 3-5 sentence narrative that articulates why change is essential, what's at stake if the organization doesn't change, and the opportunity the transformation creates. This should be emotionally resonant and strategically sound. - Vision Statement: A clear, inspiring description of the desired future state that employees can visualize and rally behind (2-3 sentences) - Strategic Alignment: Explain how this transformation connects to organizational mission, values, competitive strategy, and long-term sustainability - Burning Platform vs. Aspiration: Determine whether the change narrative should emphasize threats (burning platform) or opportunities (aspirational vision) based on organizational culture and change readiness 2. Change Management Framework Selection and Integration: - Primary Framework Recommendation: Select the most appropriate change model(s) for this transformation based on scope, culture, and change type - Kotter's 8-Step Process: For enterprise-wide transformations requiring urgency and leadership coalition - ADKAR Model: For changes requiring individual behavior change and adoption (technology, process changes) - Lewin's 3-Stage Model: For straightforward changes with clear beginning and end points - McKinsey 7-S: For complex organizational redesigns, M&A integration, or holistic system changes - Bridges' Transition Model: For changes with significant emotional impact requiring psychological transition support - Agile Change Management: For iterative, fast-moving transformations in dynamic environments - Framework Integration Strategy: Explain how multiple frameworks can work together (e.g., Kotter for overall program structure with ADKAR for individual adoption tracking) 3. Kotter's 8-Step Process Implementation (if applicable): - Step 1 - Create Urgency: Strategies to help employees understand why change cannot wait, including data, market trends, competitive threats, or customer feedback - Step 2 - Build the Guiding Coalition: Identify 8-15 influential leaders across functions, levels, and informal networks to champion the change. Include specific criteria for selection. - Step 3 - Form a Strategic Vision: Develop a clear, compelling vision with 3-5 strategic initiatives that make the vision operational - Step 4 - Enlist a Volunteer Army: Communication and engagement strategies to mobilize 10-15% of the workforce as change advocates - Step 5 - Enable Action by Removing Barriers: Identify and systematically remove obstacles including outdated systems, structures, processes, policies, or resistant leaders - Step 6 - Generate Short-Term Wins: Define 3-5 visible, meaningful wins achievable in 3-6 months that build momentum and demonstrate progress - Step 7 - Sustain Acceleration: Strategies to maintain momentum after initial wins, avoiding complacency - Step 8 - Anchor Changes in Culture: Methods to embed new behaviors, norms, and mindsets into organizational culture, performance management, and leadership development 4. ADKAR Individual Change Management (if applicable): - Awareness: Communication plan to build awareness of why change is needed, using multiple channels and messages tailored to different stakeholder groups - Desire: Strategies to create desire to participate and support the change, addressing "What's in it for me?" for different employee segments. Include incentive alignment, recognition programs, and consequence management. - Knowledge: Training and capability-building programs covering what to do, how to do it, and why it matters. Include learning paths, certifications, and knowledge management systems. - Ability: Support structures to translate knowledge into performance including coaching, mentoring, practice environments, and performance support tools - Reinforcement: Mechanisms to sustain change including recognition, rewards, performance metrics, feedback loops, and celebrating successes 5. McKinsey 7-S Organizational Alignment Analysis: - Strategy: How will strategy change? What new strategic priorities emerge? - Structure: What organizational structure changes are required (reporting lines, spans of control, layers, functional configuration)? - Systems: What processes, workflows, and technology systems need to be redesigned? - Shared Values: What cultural elements (beliefs, norms, behaviors) need to shift? What should be preserved? - Style: How must leadership style and management practices evolve? - Staff: What talent gaps exist? What workforce planning, hiring, development, or transition is needed? - Skills: What new capabilities must the organization develop? What training and development is required? - Alignment Assessment: Identify misalignments across the 7-S elements and prioritize interventions to achieve coherence 6. Resistance Management and Stakeholder Engagement: - Stakeholder Analysis: Map stakeholders using a 2x2 matrix (High/Low Influence vs. High/Low Impact). Identify champions, supporters, fence-sitters, and resistors. - Resistance Diagnosis: Identify sources of resistance using categories: * Rational resistance (legitimate concerns about strategy, feasibility, or resources) * Political resistance (power shifts, loss of status or control) * Emotional resistance (fear, anxiety, loss, uncertainty) * Cultural resistance (conflicts with values, norms, or identity) - Engagement Strategies by Stakeholder Segment: Tailor approaches using the engagement spectrum (Inform → Consult → Involve → Collaborate → Empower) - Difficult Conversation Frameworks: Guidance for leaders addressing resistance, including empathetic listening, addressing concerns transparently, and knowing when to move forward despite dissent - Consequence Management: Clear protocols for addressing persistent resistance that undermines transformation success 7. Communication and Engagement Plan: - Communication Principles: Establish guidelines for frequency (over-communicate), transparency (address bad news), consistency (aligned messages from all leaders), and multi-channel approach - Key Message Framework: Develop 5-7 core messages that answer: * Why are we changing? (The case for change) * What will change? (Scope and impact) * What will stay the same? (Continuity and stability) * What's in it for me? (Personal benefits) * How will we support you? (Resources and assistance) * What do I need to do? (Specific actions) * When will this happen? (Timeline and milestones) - Communication Channels and Cadence: Town halls (monthly), leader cascades (weekly), email updates (bi-weekly), intranet/digital hub (continuous), small group dialogues (as needed) - Two-Way Communication: Mechanisms for gathering feedback, addressing questions, and demonstrating how employee input shapes the transformation (pulse surveys, listening sessions, crowdsourcing platforms) - Leadership Visibility: Expectations for executive presence, site visits, skip-level meetings, and symbolic actions that demonstrate commitment 8. Bridges' Transition Model - Psychological Journey Management: - Ending, Losing, Letting Go: Help people understand what is ending and process loss. Acknowledge emotions, honor the past, and provide closure rituals. - Neutral Zone: Support people through the confusing transition period between old and new. Provide patience, temporary structures, coaching, and reassurance that discomfort is normal. - New Beginning: Launch new practices with celebration, reinforcement, recognition of early adopters, and clear articulation of new norms and expectations. - Emotional Support Strategies: Manager toolkits, peer support networks, EAP resources, and change coaching 9. Capability Building and Change Team Structure: - Change Leadership Team: Define governance structure including executive sponsor, transformation leader, change management office, workstream leads, and change agent network - Change Agent Network: Recruit 1 change agent per 50-100 employees across all functions and levels. Define roles, training, support, and recognition. - Manager Enablement: Managers are critical to change success. Provide manager-specific training, toolkits, conversation guides, and coaching on leading their teams through transition. - Change Management Capability: Build organizational change management competency through training, certification programs, communities of practice, and methodology documentation 10. Measurement, Monitoring, and Course Correction: - Change Adoption Metrics (Leading Indicators): Training completion, change agent activation, communication reach, employee sentiment (pulse surveys), leadership engagement, early adopter behavior - Business Impact Metrics (Lagging Indicators): Performance KPIs, productivity measures, customer satisfaction, quality metrics, financial results - Resistance and Risk Indicators: Attrition rates, absenteeism, engagement scores, grievances, safety incidents - Feedback Mechanisms: Regular pulse surveys (monthly or quarterly), focus groups, change readiness assessments, after-action reviews - Governance and Review Cadence: Weekly change team meetings, monthly steering committee reviews, quarterly board updates - Adaptation Protocols: Clear decision-making process for adjusting approach based on data, including escalation pathways and decision rights 11. Quick Wins and Momentum Building: - Define 3-5 Quick Wins: Identify visible, meaningful achievements deliverable within 3-6 months that demonstrate progress, build confidence, and create momentum - Quick Win Criteria: Visible to large numbers of people, clearly linked to transformation goals, difficult to argue against, achievable without major controversy - Celebration and Recognition Strategy: How will you amplify successes, recognize contributors, and use wins to build broader support? 12. Sustainability and Culture Embedding: - Performance Management Integration: Align individual goals, performance reviews, and compensation with new behaviors and priorities - Talent and Succession Planning: Ensure hiring profiles, promotion criteria, and succession plans reflect desired culture and capabilities - Leadership Development: Embed new leadership competencies and behaviors into development programs, 360 feedback, and coaching - Onboarding: Update new employee onboarding to socialize new culture, ways of working, and transformation story - Symbolism and Rituals: Identify symbolic actions, policies, or rituals that reinforce the new culture (e.g., meeting formats, decision processes, workspace design) - Sustaining Mechanisms: Create ongoing reinforcement including storytelling, recognition programs, continuous improvement processes, and lessons learned integration Format your response as an executive-ready transformation playbook with clear sections, stakeholder-specific strategies, implementation timelines, and measurable milestones. Include practical tools such as communication templates, resistance management frameworks, and change readiness assessments. Ensure the plan balances strategic rigor with empathy for the human experience of change, recognizing that successful transformation requires both head (rational case) and heart (emotional engagement).

organizational-transformation